In the past several years, some research institution set up in US,their purpose is clear: To research the living risk of the human. Disastrous climate change, atomic warfare, epidemic disease and the invade of aliens, these are only some of the problems that are discussed by the doomsday argument scholars. Martin Rees, one of the most famous scientists in Britain, his literary work On The Future which made us anxiety-ridden since it showed many threatens, and he helped set up the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk of the University of Cambridge. Rees's view is that for humans, the risk has never been as high as it is now: we have a high level of technical ability, and we may have accidentally destroyed the earth; we must pursue more responsible innovation.
However, we have not shown any urgency about these potential dangers. If we know that an asteroid in 2100 has a 10% chance of hitting the Earth, then we will use all our resources to save our offspring. But for the threat of global warming or genetic engineering, because these risks seem to be ambiguous, we are still indifferent, which is worrying.square steel pipes
The latest study proposed by Nick Bostrom, Click Here For More. director of the Future of Humanity Institute at the University of Oxford and with the best-selling book Superintelligence, suggests us how can we relieve these risks to the fragile Earth. The beginning of his paper presents a wonderful metaphor. Professor Bostrom proposed one way to think about human creativity is to compare this process to taking the ball out of a big jar. Fortunately, most of the balls we take out are white or beneficial, and they represent new ideas, discoveries, and technological innovations. Some of them are gray and potentially fatal. Unquestionably, the super big country made 70 thousands nuclear warhead at the cost of $10 trillions. Once it works, our civilization will be ruined.